**This page is under construction...please check back soon!**
Low Mow Policy for City Parks and Open Spaces
For many years, the City of Westminster has mowed many natural areas on parks and open space properties. While mowing will continue in certain areas, notably close to trails and other amenities, the City is adopting a “Low Mow” practice for much of our natural areas. There are many benefits to this new approach, including enhanced stormwater drainage management, water quality, supporting local plants and wildlife, and lowering fuel emissions from less time running equipment. Other neighboring jurisdictions, including Greeley, Brighton, Arvada, Lafayette and Broomfield, have successfully implemented similar policies in recent years.
PUBLIC LAND CATEGORIES
Maintained Turf Grass
PROS |
CONS |
MANAGEMENT |
High traffic tolerance |
The preferred aesthetic requires: |
Mown every 5-10 days, May-Sept |
Adapted to constant, low mowing |
- 750k-1m gallons per acre annually
|
Irrigation cycles from May-Sept:
- Sports turf fields - Dense, green turfgrass
- Aesthetic lawns - Sustain turf cover; grass will dry in the heat of summer and rebound with precipitation
|
Desirable green color and fine leaf blade |
- Ongoing fertilizer and pesticide applications
|
Pest control is handled with similar thresholds as irrigation:
- Sports turf fields will have a smaller tolerance for turn disease or weeds
- Some pests/weeds will be tolerated and only managed when significant loss is likely
|
Adequate ground cover for erosion control |
- Ongoing thatch management
|
Cultural Practices
- Fertilized 1-2x annually
- Aerated a minimum of 1x annually, site dependent
- Overseeded only to repair thin or dead turf
|
Cheap to install |
- Susceptible to winter kill in our climate
|
|
|
- Monoculture; offers zero diversity or habitat to the ecosystem
|
|
Native Grasslands - Mowed
PROS |
CONS |
MANAGEMENT |
Naturally adapted to our climate |
Lacks the aesthetic of bluegrass |
Mown every 3-6 weeks, May-Sept |
Green aesthetic with supplemental irrigation |
Poor recuperative ability, less suited to trafficked areas than bluegrass |
Irrigation is not typically available for forage grasses |
Deeper rooted than bluegrass |
Shallower rooted than unmown forage grasses |
If irrigation is available, cycles will not exceed 1 day/week |
Lower ongoing management (pesticides and fertilizer inputs) than bluegrass |
More prone to weed invasion and thus reliant on herbicides |
Pest control is performed by mechanical means, typically mowing |
Reduction in carbon footprint over a manicured landscape |
Neutral diversity offering, minimal habitat opportunity |
If chemical pest control is deemed necessary, timing will be site dependent |
Cost effective ground cover for erosion control or unirrigated ROW, trailsides |
|
|
Native Grasslands - Unmowed
PROS |
CONS |
MANAGEMENT |
Fully adapted to our climate |
Aesthetic is often referred to as unkempt or neglected |
Mown only if prescribed by staff for effective management |
Minimal inputs required once established |
Invasive species can become an issue if not managed |
Commuter trails receive edge mowing every 3-6 weeks to maintain safe travel ways |
Excellent groundcover for erosion control and water quality features |
Wildfire or grassfire potential |
Where appropriate and consistent with land management goals, fenceline edges are mowed every 3-6 weeks |
Positive diversity, offers significant habitat opportunities |
|
Irrigation is not typically available for forage grasses |
Net positive carbon footprint vs a manicured landscape |
|
Pest control is performed by mechanical means, typically mowing |
|
|
If chemical pest controls are deemed necessary, timing will be site dependent |
FAQ's